Supreme Court says Trump can't deploy National Guard to Chicago for now
Constitutional questions test judicial philosophy as Americans debate the role of unelected judges.

President Trump invoked a law called Title 10 to bring members of the Illinois National Guard under federal service over the objections of state and local leaders.
Read the original story:
CBS NewsHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The recent ruling from the Supreme Court regarding President Trump’s attempt to deploy the National Guard to Chicago highlights a significant disconnect between liberal perspectives and the pressing realities of public safety. Many media outlets frame this as a stand against federal overreach, but they overlook the growing concerns surrounding rising crime rates and public disorder in cities like Chicago, which have long hindered the rule of law.
Critics argue that local authorities should have the final say; however, they often ignore how local governance can fail in times of crisis. The national security implications of unchecked violence and unrest are grave, and it is paramount to consider the safety of citizens who are seeking protection. In this light, the federal government must step in when local leaders refuse to take critical action.
This situation reflects a broader principle at stake: the balance between state rights and federal responsibility for maintaining public trust and safety. When local leaders become ineffective, it is not federal overreach that we see but a critical necessity for intervention aimed at restoring order and protecting lives.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

