Oprah Winfrey says she will close her school for girls in South Africa
Parents assert authority over curriculum as education policy becomes a defining cultural battleground.
Oprah is closing the doors on the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls after twenty years, and whatever you think of her politics, this one deserves a straight look rather than a cheap shot. She put close to $150 million of her own money into that school. That's not a photo-op donation, that's two decades of sustained commitment to a specific place and specific girls.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Oprah Winfrey says she will close the school for underprivileged girls she set up in South Africa two decades ago at the end of next year.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Oprah is closing the doors on the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls after twenty years, and whatever you think of her politics, this one deserves a straight look rather than a cheap shot. She put close to $150 million of her own money into that school. That's not a photo-op donation, that's two decades of sustained commitment to a specific place and specific girls. It's fair to ask why it's ending now, and it's fair to want more detail than a brief statement gives us, but the instinct to sneer at the whole project would be wrong.
Here's the part worth sitting with. This was private money solving a problem privately, outside any government agency, any NGO bureaucracy, any UN initiative with its overhead and its consultants. One woman decided girls in South Africa needed a real shot and she wrote the checks herself, personally selected students, personally showed up. That's the kind of charity conservatives have always said works better than the alternative, and it's worth saying so even about someone whose politics differ sharply from ours.
None of that means the school was flawless. It had a rocky start in 2007 with an abuse scandal that Oprah handled by staying and fixing it rather than quietly walking away, which counts for something. Institutions run by wealthy celebrities aren't immune from criticism, and closures always deserve scrutiny about where the money goes and who's accountable for the kids currently enrolled.
But there's a broader point buried in this story. When private citizens fund solutions themselves, at their own expense, answerable to their own conscience rather than a federal budget line, that's the model. Twenty years and $150 million of one person's money is a longer commitment than most government programs ever manage, and it closed on her terms, not because a grant ran dry or an agency got defunded. That's worth acknowledging plainly.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

