Orsted files legal challenge over Trump's halt to $5 billion offshore wind project
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
The coverage treats Orsted’s lawsuit like a brave stand for “clean energy,” and even notes the stock pop as if markets are the referee. But the real story is a foreign multinational trying to use U. S.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Shares of Orsted, the world's largest developer of offshore wind farms, rose more than 4% on the news.
Original source:
Read at CNBCHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The coverage treats Orsted’s lawsuit like a brave stand for “clean energy,” and even notes the stock pop as if markets are the referee. But the real story is a foreign multinational trying to use U.S. courts to override an elected administration’s judgment about a massive project off our coast.
Offshore wind isn’t just an abstract climate symbol. It raises legitimate questions about permitting discipline, grid reliability, and who bears the cost when projections fail. A $5 billion build-out tied to subsidies and mandated purchases can look less like innovation and more like ratepayer risk dressed up as progress.
An America First approach asks whether this advances national energy security or locks communities into long-term commitments with uncertain benefits. Courts should enforce contracts and process, but policy choices belong to accountable officials. The principle at stake is public trust in lawful governance, not a quarterly bump in Orsted shares.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.