Ro Khanna bankrolled pro-Platner rally after women’s ‘unsettling’ allegations exploded into public view

Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.

Source: New York Post
1 min read
Why This Matters

Ro Khanna knew. That's the part worth sitting with here, not the swastika tattoo or the Reddit posts that already sank Platner once. Khanna cut checks and organized a rally to prop this guy up after multiple women had already come forward with accounts they described as unsettling.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Ro Khanna bankrolled pro-Platner rally after women’s ‘unsettling’ allegations exploded into public view
Image via New York Post

Maine Democrat Graham Platner on Friday formally withdrew from his US Senate bid.

Original source:

Read at New York Post

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Ro Khanna knew. That's the part worth sitting with here, not the swastika tattoo or the Reddit posts that already sank Platner once. Khanna cut checks and organized a rally to prop this guy up after multiple women had already come forward with accounts they described as unsettling. This wasn't before the allegations. It was after. Someone in Democratic leadership looked at that timeline and decided the play was to double down publicly rather than quietly step back.

That tells you something about how the party actually processes these moments when the candidate is useful to a particular wing. Platner had the online left excited, the populist-veteran packaging, the anti-establishment resume. When women raised concerns, the instinct from a sitting congressman wasn't caution. It was a rally. Compare that to how fast the same apparatus torches a Republican over far thinner allegations, sometimes anonymous, sometimes decades old and never substantiated. The standard shifts depending on whose candidate it is.

Platner eventually withdrew anyway, so the base of the party still had more sense than its bankrollers did. But Khanna's bet is on the record now. He didn't wait for facts to shake out or for a serious internal review. He picked a side before the story was even finished being reported, and it happened to be the side that needed defending, not the women who came forward.

That's worth remembering next time Democrats lecture the country about believing women or taking allegations seriously. The principle apparently comes with an asterisk for candidates leadership likes.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.