Scott Jennings Says Clean Voter Rolls Are Just Common Sense

Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.

Source: Townhall
1 min read
Why This Matters

Josh Kaul and Tony Evers want us to believe voter rolls are a privacy matter. That's a strange hill to die on for a list of names, addresses, and registration dates that election clerks handle every single day. Nobody's asking for medical records or bank statements.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Scott Jennings Says Clean Voter Rolls Are Just Common Sense
Image via Townhall

<![CDATA[Democrats have long resisted cleaning up voter rolls. In this writer's home state of Wisconsin, the Democratic Attorney General, Josh Kaul, and the Democratic Governor, Tony Evers, are citing 'privacy' concerns as their grounds for refusing to turn over the state's voter information.]]>

Original source:

Read at Townhall

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Josh Kaul and Tony Evers want us to believe voter rolls are a privacy matter. That's a strange hill to die on for a list of names, addresses, and registration dates that election clerks handle every single day. Nobody's asking for medical records or bank statements. They're asking whether the rolls actually reflect who's alive, who's moved, and who's eligible to vote in Wisconsin. That used to be considered basic housekeeping, not a scandal.

Scott Jennings calling this common sense is almost an understatement. Every state runs into the same problem: people die, people relocate, people register twice across state lines without anyone noticing for years. Cleaning that up isn't voter suppression, it's maintenance. The fact that Wisconsin's own Attorney General is the one blocking the process tells you where the incentive lies. If you think tighter margins help your side, a messy roll starts to look less like an error and more like a feature.

What's frustrating is how predictable this has become. Every time a Republican official or commentator brings up roll maintenance, it gets treated like a coded attack rather than a data integrity question. Wisconsin decided a presidential election by roughly 20,000 votes in 2020. In a state that close, accuracy isn't optional, it's the whole ballgame. Refusing to hand over information under a privacy pretext doesn't inspire confidence, it invites suspicion.

Voters in Wisconsin deserve rolls that reflect reality, not political convenience dressed up as caution. If Kaul and Evers have nothing to hide, there's no reason to keep stonewalling a routine records request. Clean rolls aren't a partisan demand, they're the minimum requirement for trusting the results..

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.