Senate to vote on stopgap bill to keep government open through Dec. 11
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
Dec. 11. Mark it down, because that's the next time Congress will pretend to have a real conversation about how it spends your money.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The Senate is set to take a test vote Monday on a stopgap appropriations bill that will keep the government open through Dec. 11. The measure, released Sunday evening, has bipartisan support and is expected to earn more than the 60 votes needed to overcome any filibuster.
Original source:
Read at Washington TimesHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Dec. 11. Mark it down, because that's the next time Congress will pretend to have a real conversation about how it spends your money. Until then, it's another stopgap, another can kicked, another round of lawmakers patting themselves on the back for doing the one thing they're actually required to do: keep the lights on.
Bipartisan support sounds nice in a headline. What it really means here is that nobody wanted to own a shutdown heading into the fall, so both sides agreed to punt rather than fight over anything substantive. That's not governance. That's scheduling. The bill was dropped Sunday evening and is already clearing 60 votes before most Americans even know it exists, which tells you how much genuine debate went into it.
We're not against keeping the government funded. Nobody sane wants a shutdown for its own sake. But a stopgap measure that sails through with bipartisan ease usually means the hard questions, spending levels, priorities, what actually belongs in a federal budget, got shoved off the table again. Dec. 11 will arrive and we'll do this dance one more time, probably with less scrutiny than this one got.
At some point "we avoided a shutdown" has to stop being treated like an accomplishment. Keeping the lights on isn't leadership. It's the floor, not the ceiling, and Congress has been living comfortably on the floor for years.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

