Sending soldiers to Minneapolis for immigration crackdown would be unconstitutional, mayor says
Sovereignty and security converge at the border where policy failures demand accountability.
The mayor’s quote is designed to settle the matter before it starts: label the idea “ridiculous” and “unconstitutional,” and no one has to ask why border enforcement has reached a breaking point. That framing treats public concern as hysteria rather than a response to years of evasive federal policy. Conservatives should be clear: the question is not whether we want troops patrolling neighborhoods.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The mayor of Minneapolis said Sunday that sending active duty soldiers into Minnesota to help with an immigration crackdown is a ridiculous and unconstitutional idea.
Original source:
Read at Chicago TribuneHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The mayor’s quote is designed to settle the matter before it starts: label the idea “ridiculous” and “unconstitutional,” and no one has to ask why border enforcement has reached a breaking point. That framing treats public concern as hysteria rather than a response to years of evasive federal policy.
Conservatives should be clear: the question is not whether we want troops patrolling neighborhoods. It’s whether Washington will enforce the law without forcing local communities to absorb the consequences. If leaders won’t distinguish between targeted support roles and indiscriminate militarization, they blur the debate on purpose.
Any federal action must respect the Constitution, civilian control, and clear legal authority. But “unconstitutional” is not a magic word that cancels rule of law or public trust. The principle at stake is simple: a nation that can’t enforce its own laws will eventually struggle to govern fairly.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

