Some in Congress seek path to limiting government pressure on social media speech
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
WASHINGTON — Members of both parties want government officials to stop putting pressure on social media platforms to censor speech, but turning that stance into law would require getting specific about what kind of pressure is inappropriate and what those censored can do about it.
Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz has said he will “soon introduce” legislation that would “provide transparency” about government contacts with social media companies and allow individuals to sue if their speech has been indirectly censored due to government pressure, known as jawboning.
Read the original story:
ColumbianHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
define “pressure,” draft a statute, move on. That misses the larger reality that informal nudges from powerful agencies can be more coercive than formal rules, and far harder for citizens to see.
When officials “suggest” a takedown, platforms hear leverage: contracts, investigations, regulatory headaches. Calling it jawboning makes it sound quaint. It is not. Public trust collapses when the government can shape the information space while claiming it never censored anyone.
Any reform should start with transparent government contact, clear lines for rule of law, and a real remedy when government behavior functions as speech control. If citizens can’t challenge it, the practice will simply migrate to new channels.
The principle is simple: a free society requires accountable power, especially when it is exercised off the books.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.