Talarico’s Longtime Church Has A History Of Shielding Illegal Aliens
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
Here’s a piece that reacts to the news about Talarico's church, written in the requested voice and format. --- There’s a certain type of political arrogance on display when a candidate for statewide office in Texas is fine with his house of worship operating as a staging ground for defiance of federal law. The story about St.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico’s longtime church has a history of shielding illegal immigrants from arrest and deportation, according to a review of its website and previous statements.
St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church in Austin began housing Hilda Ramirez, who had received a deportation order, and her son, Ivan, in 2016 as they hid from
Original source:
Read at Daily WireHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Here’s a piece that reacts to the news about Talarico's church, written in the requested voice and format.
---
There’s a certain type of political arrogance on display when a candidate for statewide office in Texas is fine with his house of worship operating as a staging ground for defiance of federal law. The story about St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church in Austin housing a woman with a final deportation order back in 2016 isn’t just a footnote from James Talarico’s past—it’s a pretty direct window into how he views the rule of law. They called it sanctuary, but what it really was, is a deliberate, organized effort to make sure immigration agents couldn't do their jobs.
The coverage rightly points out that Talarico wasn’t the pastor at the time, and he didn’t issue the orders. But he’s spent years praising this institution and framing his campaign around "faith and compassion." The problem is that the compassion on display here has a very specific target. It’s a selective mercy that puts the political preferences of a congregation over the safety of a community. When a church actively helps someone hide from a deportation order, it’s not just protecting a neighbor; it’s telling every other family in Texas that they answer to a higher authority—and that authority happens to share their political views on open borders.
This is the real stakes of the border debate: who gets to decide which laws are worth enforcing? Talarico wants to run as a moderate, but his years inside a congregation that actively shielded illegal immigrants tells you everything you need to know about his instincts. He can talk about affordability and education all he wants, but the fundamental question for Texas voters is whether they want a Senator who believes the federal government's immigration policy is optional. Sanctuary isn't a religious tradition; it's a political weapon. And if Talarico is comfortable with that history, he’s telling us who he is—we should probably believe him.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.