Taxing homeowners ‘from away’ is good politics, bad constitutional law | Opinion
Tax policy debates center on growth versus redistribution as Americans weigh economic freedom.
The coverage treats Maine’s housing squeeze as a blank check for singling out “people from away. ” It may read as clever politics, but it smuggles in a bigger assumption: that the state can pick winners and losers based on where someone lives, and call it policy. That framing misses what actually drives prices: tight supply, slow permitting, and local resistance to building.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Maine's housing problem is very real. So are the legal obstacles to solving it.
Original source:
Read at The Portland Press HeraldHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The coverage treats Maine’s housing squeeze as a blank check for singling out “people from away.” It may read as clever politics, but it smuggles in a bigger assumption: that the state can pick winners and losers based on where someone lives, and call it policy.
That framing misses what actually drives prices: tight supply, slow permitting, and local resistance to building. A special tax on out of staters feels satisfying, yet it dodges the hard work of expanding housing while inviting the courts to step in and strike it down.
Conservatives worry about equal protection under the law, constitutional limits, and public trust in fair rules. If a policy cannot survive basic scrutiny, it is not a serious solution. The principle at stake is simple: fix the market, don’t punish the outsider.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.