Todd Blanche moves closer to confirmation after rescinding $1.8B fund
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
Todd Blanche pulling back that $1. 8 billion fund isn't a small procedural footnote, and it shouldn't be treated like one. It's the kind of move that actually tells you something about a nominee, because it happened under pressure and he did it anyway.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Blanche appeared to meet request to limit the scope of an IRS audit immunity deal that covered the Trump family.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Todd Blanche pulling back that $1.8 billion fund isn't a small procedural footnote, and it shouldn't be treated like one. It's the kind of move that actually tells you something about a nominee, because it happened under pressure and he did it anyway. The original arrangement, an audit immunity deal broad enough to cover the Trump family's own tax matters, was never going to survive contact with a confirmation hearing, and it shouldn't have. Whatever you think of Blanche's politics, walking that back was the right call, not the convenient one.
What's worth noticing here is how quickly the story shifted once he narrowed the scope. Confirmation fights usually calcify around a nominee's worst moment. This one seems to be moving because Blanche did the thing critics actually asked for, rather than just promising to think about it. That's rarer in Washington than anyone wants to admit. Nominees usually dig in, issue a statement about "process," and dare the Senate to make an issue of it. Blanche just fixed the problem.
There's a broader point buried in this that has nothing to do with Trump specifically. Any arrangement that lets a Treasury or IRS-adjacent official carve out audit protection for a politically connected family, regardless of party, deserves exactly this kind of scrutiny. The system only works if the rules bend the same way for everyone, including the people writing them. Blanche narrowing the deal instead of defending it is a small data point in favor of that actually being true here.
None of this means the nomination sails through clean. Senators will still ask why the fund existed in that form to begin with, and they should. But there's a difference between a nominee who gets caught and one who corrects course before the vote. Blanche looks like the latter, and that ought to count for something when the roll is called.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

