Trump-backed Republicans aren’t courting endorsements of outgoing senators

Constitutional questions test judicial philosophy as Americans debate the role of unelected judges.

Source: Washington Examiner
1 min read
Why This Matters

Nobody is asking Cornyn, Cassidy, or Tillis for their blessing, and that tells you almost everything you need to know about where the party actually stands right now. These are three sitting Republican senators, not fringe figures, and the candidates lining up to replace them are apparently calculating that a photo op or a joint statement with the outgoing guy does more harm than good. That's not an accident.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Trump-backed Republicans aren’t courting endorsements of outgoing senators
Image via Washington Examiner

The trio of candidates vying to replace Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX), Bill Cassidy (R-LA), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) has, at least so far, not sought their endorsements, the outgoing senators told the Washington Examiner.

The moves, or lack thereof, from the possible successors offer windows into GOP campaign strategies and lingering party tensions after contentious […]

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Nobody is asking Cornyn, Cassidy, or Tillis for their blessing, and that tells you almost everything you need to know about where the party actually stands right now. These are three sitting Republican senators, not fringe figures, and the candidates lining up to replace them are apparently calculating that a photo op or a joint statement with the outgoing guy does more harm than good. That's not an accident. That's a read on the base.

Cornyn spent years as the institutional face of Senate Republicanism in Texas, and now he can't get a courtesy call from the people hoping to inherit his seat. Cassidy voted to convict Trump on impeachment and has been persona non grata with a huge chunk of Louisiana Republicans ever since. Tillis has spent the Trump era zigzagging between MAGA cooperation and Bush-era instincts, never quite committing to either. None of these men are asking to be discarded, but their own successors seem to think associating with them is a liability rather than an asset.

What's actually interesting here isn't the snub itself, it's what it says about how primary politics have shifted. A decade ago, an outgoing senator's endorsement was a chit you wanted, a signal of establishment approval that helped with fundraising and name recognition. Now it can be a mark against you if the base has soured on that senator. These candidates aren't rejecting the institution of the Senate seat, they're rejecting the specific baggage attached to the men who held it.

Whether that's smart long-term strategy or just short-term primary math is worth watching. Winning a primary by running from the incumbent is one thing. Governing a state, or showing up to actually work with your Senate colleagues once you get there, is another. But for now, the message from these campaigns is unmistakable: association with the old guard is a cost, not a credential, and nobody wants to pay it.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.