Trump birthright citizenship fight comes roaring back with ‘invaders’ play after Kavanaugh roadmap

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: Fox News
1 min read
Why This Matters

Justice Kavanaugh basically drew a map and told everyone where the exits were, and now Congress is walking through one of them. That's the real story here, not the shouting about "invaders" language that's already sucking up all the oxygen. The Citizenship Act isn't trying to rewrite the Fourteenth Amendment by press release.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Trump birthright citizenship fight comes roaring back with ‘invaders’ play after Kavanaugh roadmap
Image via Fox News

The Citizenship Act uses Wong Kim Ark case exceptions to legislatively end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and birth tourists.

Original source:

Read at Fox News

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Justice Kavanaugh basically drew a map and told everyone where the exits were, and now Congress is walking through one of them. That's the real story here, not the shouting about "invaders" language that's already sucking up all the oxygen. The Citizenship Act isn't trying to rewrite the Fourteenth Amendment by press release. It's trying to legislate inside the exceptions that Wong Kim Ark itself carved out over a century ago, the ones covering people not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States in the full legal sense.

Whether that theory holds up is a real question, and we're not going to pretend it's settled just because it's convenient. But it's not the fringe argument critics keep describing. Diplomats' kids don't get birthright citizenship. Nobody disputes that. The fight is over how far that carve-out logically extends, and pretending the question was closed forever in 1898 is its own kind of dishonesty.

Where this gets messy is the "birth tourism" and "invaders" framing, because that's where legal precision turns into political theater. Lawmakers who actually want this to survive a Supreme Court that just signaled it might listen would do well to write the statute like they're arguing a case, not a rally speech. Kavanaugh handed them an opening. Whether they use it or blow it with sloppy language is entirely on them now.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.