Trump fires Democrats on election board ahead of midterms

Election integrity questions persist as states navigate federal mandates and voter confidence.

Source: Washington Times
1 min read
Why This Matters

The Election Assistance Commission was built to be split down the middle on purpose, four seats, two parties, nobody able to run the table. That was the deal Congress cut after 2000 specifically so election administration wouldn't become another partisan football. Trump just cleared the Democratic side off the board four months before a midterm.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Trump fires Democrats on election board ahead of midterms
Image via Washington Times

President Trump removed the remaining Democratic commissioners from a bipartisan panel tasked with helping state and local officials conduct elections, four months before the midterm elections that will determine which party controls Congress.

Original source:

Read at Washington Times

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

The Election Assistance Commission was built to be split down the middle on purpose, four seats, two parties, nobody able to run the table. That was the deal Congress cut after 2000 specifically so election administration wouldn't become another partisan football. Trump just cleared the Democratic side off the board four months before a midterm. However you want to spin the legal justification, the optics here are not subtle.

And optics matter more than usual right now, because trust in how elections get run is already running on fumes. Every time a president of either party reaches into a body designed to be balanced and tips it his way, he's spending down a resource that took decades to build and takes seconds to torch. Republicans spent years arguing, rightly in a lot of cases, that election administration needed more transparency and less one-party control. This move cuts against that argument. You don't get to complain about the referee being biased and then fire the other side's referees.

Maybe there's a personnel case to be made about specific commissioners. Fine, make it, in public, with specifics. What we got instead was a clean sweep dressed up as routine turnover, timed right before voters go to the polls in a cycle that will decide who runs the House. That timing is the tell. If this were about competence or conduct, it could have waited until after November without changing anything about how the midterms get run.

We want election bodies that Americans across the spectrum can look at and believe are calling balls and strikes. That gets harder every time either party decides bipartisan structure is optional when it's inconvenient. Republicans should want the EAC intact and credible going into a contested midterm, not gutted on one side, because a lopsided panel is exactly the kind of thing that hands Democrats a talking point they didn't earn.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.