Trump news at a glance: US promotes Elon Musk’s X to fight foreign propaganda
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
The Guardian treats this cable like a scandal because it names X and mentions coordination with military information specialists. That framing assumes any assertive response to propaganda is inherently suspect, as if America’s diplomats should politely ignore hostile narratives shaping public opinion overseas. What’s missing is the basic reality that foreign actors wage information warfare every day.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Cable signed by secretary of state Marco Rubio endorses Musk’s platform by name and suggests staff work with Pentagon psychological operations unit – key US politics stories from Monday 30 March at a glance The United States has directed every American embassy and consulate across the world to launch coordinated campaigns against foreign propaganda and endorses Elon Musk’s Twitter/X as an “innovative” tool to help do it.
The cable, signed by the secretary of state, Marco Rubio , on Monday and obtained by the Guardian, also suggests embassies and consulates work alongside the US military’s psychological operations unit to address the problem of rampant disinformation.
It lays out a sweeping set of instructions for how embassy staff should push back against what it describes as coordinated f...
Original source:
Read at The GuardianHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The Guardian treats this cable like a scandal because it names X and mentions coordination with military information specialists. That framing assumes any assertive response to propaganda is inherently suspect, as if America’s diplomats should politely ignore hostile narratives shaping public opinion overseas.
What’s missing is the basic reality that foreign actors wage information warfare every day. The question is not whether to respond, but how to do it without sliding into domestic manipulation. That line matters, and it should be explicit: countering foreign propaganda abroad is not the same as policing Americans’ speech at home.
If X is effective, officials should be able to use it without pretending the platform is taboo. The real safeguards are rule of law, clear mission boundaries, and public trust. Used carefully, this is national security work, not partisan messaging.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.