Trump slashes 3 million acres from Utah monuments

This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

Source: Washington Times
1 min read
Why This Matters

Three million acres is not a rounding error. That's the number that jumps out here, and it's worth sitting with for a second before wading into the legal fight everyone already has memorized. Biden expanded these monuments by executive fiat in 2021, undoing Trump's first-term cuts, which had undone Obama's designations.

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Trump slashes 3 million acres from Utah monuments
Image via Washington Times

President Trump signed two executive orders Monday slashing nearly 3 million acres from Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments in Utah, reversing Biden-era expansions and reigniting a decades-long battle over presidential authority under the Antiquities Act.

Original source:

Read at Washington Times

How We See It

New Republican Times Editorial Board

Three million acres is not a rounding error. That's the number that jumps out here, and it's worth sitting with for a second before wading into the legal fight everyone already has memorized. Biden expanded these monuments by executive fiat in 2021, undoing Trump's first-term cuts, which had undone Obama's designations. This is the third or fourth time these same acres have flipped status depending on who's sitting in the Oval Office. That's not conservation policy. That's a pendulum being yanked back and forth by men who never have to live with the consequences on the ground in San Juan County.

The Antiquities Act was written in 1906 to protect small, specific sites like cliff dwellings and burial grounds from looters, not to hand any president the power to lock up landmasses the size of small states with the stroke of a pen. Bears Ears alone had ballooned to 1.36 million acres under Biden. Nobody seriously believes that entire footprint consists of irreplaceable archaeological treasures requiring federal lockdown. Somewhere in there is grazing land, mineral rights, and access that local ranchers and tribal members alike have argued over for years, and their voices tend to get flattened by whoever's environmental coalition is loudest in Washington that decade.

Utah's own elected officials, including its congressional delegation, have pushed for this rollback for years, arguing that Washington overreached and ignored the people who actually live on this land. That argument doesn't evaporate just because the monuments have "national" in the name. If Trump's order gets challenged in court, as it certainly will, the real question isn't whether he can do this. Obama, Clinton, and Trump himself already proved presidents can. The question is why we've let a hundred-year-old law become a weapon every administration uses to unilaterally redraw the map, with no lasting settlement and no end in sight.

Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.