Trump terminates remaining members of Election Assistance Commission after landmark Supreme Court ruling expanded his powers
Election integrity questions persist as states navigate federal mandates and voter confidence.
A commission with zero commissioners is not a commission anymore. It's a shell with a letterhead. That's where the EAC sits now after Trump cleared out the remaining members, and however you feel about the man's appetite for firing people, the underlying question is worth sitting with: what was this body actually doing that required bipartisan permanent tenure to protect it from the president who appoints it?
New Republican Times Editorial Board

The terminations leave the bipartisan EAC with no commissioners and an uncertain future. It’s unclear if Trump will move to appoint new members to the commission.
Original source:
Read at New York PostHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
A commission with zero commissioners is not a commission anymore. It's a shell with a letterhead. That's where the EAC sits now after Trump cleared out the remaining members, and however you feel about the man's appetite for firing people, the underlying question is worth sitting with: what was this body actually doing that required bipartisan permanent tenure to protect it from the president who appoints it?
The EAC was built in the wake of 2000's hanging-chad mess to standardize voting equipment and shore up public confidence. Noble goal. But confidence in election administration hasn't exactly been soaring the last few cycles, commission or no commission, which tells you the agency's insulation from accountability didn't buy the country much. The Supreme Court just told Trump he has the power to clean house at agencies like this one. He used it. That's not a constitutional crisis, that's a president reading a ruling and acting on it the same day.
The real story isn't the purge, it's the uncertainty after it. Nobody knows if Trump refills these seats, leaves the commission dark, or folds its functions somewhere else entirely. If the goal is genuinely stronger election administration and not just settling scores with an agency that's mostly issued reports nobody reads, the next move matters more than this one. An empty commission helps nobody, least of all the voters who were told this body existed to protect their trust in the process.
We'd rather see Trump name replacements who take the job seriously than watch the EAC drift into irrelevance by neglect. Power without follow-through is just theater, and this White House has bigger things to prove than how fast it can clear out a small agency's org chart.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

