Trump’s Christmas Day Airstrikes in Nigeria Spark Outrage and Divide
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.

On Christmas Day, the Trump Administration confirmed "powerful and deadly" U.S. military strikes against ISIS-linked militants in northwest Nigeria. Read more
Read the original story:
The RootHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The outrage over Christmas Day strikes in Nigeria says more about the media’s reflexes than the facts. Coverage leans on the symbolism of the date and the drama of “divide,” as if the first question is optics instead of whether Americans were safer when the operation ended.
What’s missing is a sober look at the threat. ISIS affiliates in West Africa are not a regional nuisance. They traffic, recruit, and plot across borders. If U.S. intelligence identifies a lawful target and Nigeria can’t or won’t neutralize it, refusing to act for fear of headlines is not restraint. It is negligence.
Conservatives care about national security first, but also rule of law and public trust. That means clear authority, tight targeting, and accountability after the fact. The principle at stake is simple: American lives are not props for media narratives, and decisive deterrence matters.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

