Warren says she only pays ‘attention to almost one out of 10’ opinions from Carville
Progressive policy ambitions meet practical realities as Americans weigh costs and consequences.
Elizabeth Warren getting cornered by a TMZ camera and forced to referee a James Carville versus Hasan Piker feud tells you everything about where the Democratic Party actually is right now. She didn't defend Carville. She didn't really defend Piker either.
New Republican Times Editorial Board

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Monday said she seldom pays attention to comments and musings made by longtime Democratic strategist James Carville. TMZ spoke with Warren about Carville's comments over the weekend that he would leave the Democratic Party if left-wing Twitch streamer Hasan Piker became a party mainstay.
Learning of the remark caused the
Original source:
Read at The HillHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Elizabeth Warren getting cornered by a TMZ camera and forced to referee a James Carville versus Hasan Piker feud tells you everything about where the Democratic Party actually is right now. She didn't defend Carville. She didn't really defend Piker either. She just shrugged and said she only listens to the old strategist "one out of 10" times, which is a polite way of saying the party's most famous truth-teller has become background noise they'd rather not deal with.
That's the real story here, not the spat itself. Carville has spent months warning his own party that chasing internet-left energy, the Piker crowd, the extremely-online activist class, is a losing strategy with actual voters. He's been right often enough that people used to call him a savant for it. Now a sitting senator can barely be bothered to acknowledge him on camera without minimizing his relevance. That's not a small thing. When your party's most successful strategist becomes an inconvenience to wave off rather than a warning to heed, you've already told on yourself.
Warren's instinct to dodge is understandable politically. She doesn't want to pick a side in a fight between the party's old guard and its streaming-native flank, because either answer costs her something with somebody. But dodging is itself an answer. It says the Democratic coalition is now split between people who think Hasan Piker is a legitimate voice worth courting and people who think saying so out loud is career suicide, and their senators would rather talk about anything else.
Republicans should take note, not gloat. A party this unwilling to have its own argument in public is a party that hasn't figured out what it believes yet. That's an opportunity, but it's also a reminder to make sure our own house isn't heading toward the same kind of avoidance.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.

