Why Pakistan’s bid to broker US
This story raises questions about governance, accountability, and American values.
The coverage treats Pakistan’s would be role as a neutral “bridge” as if diplomacy is mostly about the right messenger. That framing flatters Islamabad and lowers the bar for Tehran, as though a new intermediary can substitute for hard choices. What gets missed is the credibility problem.
New Republican Times Editorial Board
Middle East News: Efforts led by Pakistan to broker peace between Iran and the United States have faltered. According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, Tehran has.
Original source:
Read at Timesofindia.indiatimes.comHow We See It
New Republican Times Editorial Board
The coverage treats Pakistan’s would be role as a neutral “bridge” as if diplomacy is mostly about the right messenger. That framing flatters Islamabad and lowers the bar for Tehran, as though a new intermediary can substitute for hard choices.
What gets missed is the credibility problem. Pakistan has its own regional aims, its own security services, and a long record of playing multiple sides. Asking Washington to lean on that channel risks outsourcing leverage to a partner whose interests often diverge from ours. And Iran has repeatedly used talks to buy time while keeping pressure on the region.
A serious approach starts with rule of law, verifiable commitments, and national security first, not photo ops. Peace that rests on public trust and institutional stability lasts. Peace built on wishful mediation does not.
Commentary written with AI assistance by the New Republican Times Editorial Board.